&&**
Tim Roberts
timr at gssc.UUCP
Thu Sep 13 02:07:13 AEST 1990
In article <20757:Sep1115:30:0390 at kramden.acf.nyu.edu> brnstnd at kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein) writes:
>In article <0926 at sheol.UUCP> throopw at sheol.UUCP (Wayne Throop) writes:
> [ that if a compiler reduces &&**x to x then it is buggy ]
>
>Question for the standards people: Is && undefined, unspecified,
>implementation-defined, or what have you?
Of course && is defined! It's the logical "AND" operator! :-)
And now, back to our regularly scheduled debate.
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list