prototypes, NULL, and magic

[Chris Torek]

In article <1561 at sheol.UUCP> throopw at sheol.UUCP (Wayne Throop) writes:
>So, specifically: under the upcoming BSD release, with prototypes in
>scope, is it really safe to use unadorned NULL to terminate a
>variable argument list a-la execl(2) family as Chris seemed to
>imply (but did not explicitly state)?

Oh, is *that* what you meant?  Of course the answer is `no' ..

>More generally, with prototypes in scope, are there any but the default
>promotions which occur for arguments referenced by the "..." argument
>specifier?

... because the answer to this is (perforce) `no'.
-- 
In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Lawrence Berkeley Lab CSE/EE (+1 415 486 5427)
Berkeley, CA		Domain:	torek at ee.lbl.gov