dynamic loaders

[Chris Torek]

In article <12532 at dog.ee.lbl.gov> I left out a word:

>If you are bound and determined to do this in C, you must implement
>your own type [and] function binding systems.

Without the `and' it makes little sense.

Note that although the subject asked for a dynamic loader (which can
be implemented in machine-dependent C), but the body of the article
also asked for, in essense, some way to define `in advance' all of
the possible function call protocols.  This also can be implemented in
machine-dependent C, but it then becomes compiler-dependent as well.
-- 
In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Lawrence Berkeley Lab CSE/EE (+1 415 486 5427)
Berkeley, CA		Domain:	torek at ee.lbl.gov