Unix Stack Frame Questions
Chris Dollin
kers at hplb.hpl.hp.com
Mon Apr 8 18:57:47 AEST 1991
Rahul Dhesi says:
>>But a stack frame seems to be the most efficient way of dealing with
>>calls and returns.
>No, there are =many= better ways.
BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ....
A "stack frame" is the ONLY way of dealing with calls and returns *if
they may be recursive*.
*Where* the stack frame lies is another question. Part of it may be in
registers. It's still a stack frame.
Does calling it a stack frame make it a stack frame? It might be just a record
in the heap. Whether we call that a ``stack frame'' or not seems to be a matter
of taste.
--
Regards, Kers 24059 | "You're better off not dreaming of the things to come;
Caravan: | Dreams are always ending far too soon."
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list