micro-optimizing loops (was Help with casts)
Conor O'Neill
conor at lion.inmos.co.uk
Thu Feb 28 02:15:22 AEST 1991
In article <10191 at dog.ee.lbl.gov> torek at elf.ee.lbl.gov (Chris Torek) writes:
>Of course, the best optimization for:
>
> for (i = 1; i < 100; i++)
> x += i;
>
>is:
>
> x += 4950;
No.
Try
{ x += 4950; i = 100; }
---
Conor O'Neill, Software Group, INMOS Ltd., UK.
UK: conor at inmos.co.uk US: conor at inmos.com
"It's state-of-the-art" "But it doesn't work!" "That is the state-of-the-art".
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list