cond. op. on ='s LHS

[Michael Henning]

throopw at sheol.UUCP (Wayne Throop) writes:

>As Dan Bernstein has pointed out in another article, Richard is
>incorrect here.  While it is true that the result of ?: is never
>an lvalue, this is irrelevant since the result of * always is.	
                                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Hmmm...

What about

int	array[10][10];

and an expression

	*array

The type of the expression after dereferencing is "array of 10 ints", which
is *not* an lvalue.


							Michi.
-- 
      -m------- Michael Henning			+61 75 950255
    ---mmm----- Pyramid Technology		+61 75 522475 FAX
  -----mmmmm--- Research Park, Bond University	michi at ptcburp.ptcbu.oz.au
-------mmmmmmm- Gold Coast, Q 4229, AUSTRALIA	uunet!munnari!ptcburp.oz!michi