Strings as function names (again)

[R. Kym Horsell]

In article <wolfram.666028267 at ikki> wolfram at ikki.informatik.rwth-aachen.de (Wolfram Roesler) writes:
>gwyn at smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn) writes:
>
>>One is that you have to tell it a path to the executable file, and
>>that is not in general available for the currently-executing process.
>
>Sure? How about argv[0] ?

Sure! What about execXXX -- it's only a _convention_ that argv[0]
is installed as any kind of filename.

-kym