Efficient STRing CoMPares?
Sean Eric Fagan
sef at kithrup.COM
Thu Mar 21 18:03:10 AEST 1991
In article <15537 at smoke.brl.mil> gwyn at smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn) writes:
>It is also possible for <string.h> to #define strcmp __strcmp and have
>the compiler in-line __strcmp instead of strcmp. This may make it
>slightly easier for the implementation to support access to the
>external-function definition of strcmp mentioned in my first paragraph.
ANSI C still has the requirement that
#undef strcmp
(after including <string.h>) give the user the version from the library,
doesn't it? (A footnone in one of the sections; I don't have my copy with
me, so I can't give explicit details.) In any event, that footnote seemed
to indicate pretty well how the committee thought intrinsics should be
handled...
--
Sean Eric Fagan | "I made the universe, but please don't blame me for it;
sef at kithrup.COM | I had a bellyache at the time."
-----------------+ -- The Turtle (Stephen King, _It_)
Any opinions expressed are my own, and generally unpopular with others.
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list