Func Protos with K&R Func Defs

[Doug Gwyn]

In article <MLT9QB7 at xds13.ferranti.com> peter at ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) writes:
>In article <15354 at smoke.brl.mil> gwyn at smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn) writes:
>> This is not true.  The types must be compatible, but subject to that
>> constraint the use of "old-style definitions" is compatible with the
>> use of prototypes.

>Only if the prototype is in scope when it sees the definition.

Wrong.