SPS - a useful replacement for ps(1) (but....)
Sean Casey
sean at ukma.UUCP
Fri Jun 28 14:51:52 AEST 1985
Sps is fast, easy to understand, wonderful, and free, but.....
% sps vt h1
Ty User Status Fl Nice Virtual Resident %M Time Child %C Proc# Command
h1 sean PAUSE 124+ 17 70+ 17 2 87.7 0 24140 sysline -b
h1 sean PAUSE 68+ 65 42+ 65 1 68.7+ 12 M 0 24818 -csh
h1 *root PAUSE 62+ 65 38+ 65 1 27.5+332.6 1 26167 -u
h1 * STOP 78+ 23 37+ 19 1 10.1 0 27006 postnews
h1 | STOP 176+108 127+ 94 4 19.7 0 27117 /usr/ucb/vi
h1. * RUN -20 238+ 22 34+ 14 1 2.0 0 27148 sps vt h1
80 (5838k) processes, 1 (260k) busy, 55 (1340k) loaded, 24 (491k) swapped
^^
||
Look at the nice figure for sps. Isn't that a little extreme? I like fast
response as much as anyone, but at the ultimate expense of others?
Just thought I'd warn ya.
P.S. For a not good time, try "sps adefgvwr > /dev/null &"
More information about the Comp.sources.bugs
mailing list