bug in vn
bobm at rtech.UUCP
bobm at rtech.UUCP
Thu Feb 5 06:01:36 AEST 1987
OK, we had a discussion on this one a few weeks back. Preventative medicine
like this is a good idea, but you should also go into the gethead() routine
in that same source and replace
if (index(buf,':') == NULL)
with
if (buf[0] == '\n')
To be more correct, you should incorporate a special fgets that folds the
continued header lines, such as someone posted, but given the use being
made of the header lines in this context, it probably won't matter - the
examples I've seen don't fold any relevent lines, and the Subject will
be truncated anyway.
I'm curious about something - vn has been happily running with the original
logic from the first issue of the program, and in my private copies for the
last 3 years. Somebody has just recently started sending out the continued
lines - seemingly all articles from BITNET. I admit that they're allowed
to do so, and that looking for the colon is a bug, but I'd still like to
know what issue of what posting software is generating the folded lines now.
Only from BITNET? Only at 2.11 sites? We're running 2.10.3, and I can't
say that I've ever seen such an article here.
--
Bob McQueer
{amdahl, sun, mtxinu, hoptoad, cpsc6a}!rtech!bobm
More information about the Comp.sources.bugs
mailing list