flex notes, request, and bugs
Vern Paxson
vern%lbl-pistachio at LBL-RTSG.ARPA
Wed May 11 14:00:52 AEST 1988
I'll incorporate the notes Esmond mentioned into the upcoming release's
man page, along with a #define to distinguish between flex- and lex-generated
scanners. Thanks for the suggestions.
Regarding:
> 3. Bug: The pattern
>
> "DATA"([ \n;,])+/("."|[ \n;,])
>
> which arises in one of my scripts after name expansion, is incorrectly
> treated as having variable length head & tail & is thus rejected.
While this is a valid bug, it's a bit of a pain to fix. I was hoping
that it would rarely arise and then in most cases would be easy enough
to work around. Note that the above pattern can also be written:
"DATA"([ \n;,])+/[ .\n;,]
which will then be accepted by flex. I will add the bug to the man page.
> 4. Bug: the following script for 80-column Cobol card images
> gets 'NULL in input' under flex -f or -F, even after the '-f/-F' patch.
> ...
I could not get this bug to repeat. Esmond, if can you send me more
details regarding the failure (and possibly the flex output file),
I may be able to trace it down.
Vern
Vern Paxson vern at lbl-csam.arpa
Real Time Systems ucbvax!lbl-csam.arpa!vern
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory (415) 486-6411
More information about the Comp.sources.bugs
mailing list