missing elm patch #2 (and 0/1!)

[Frank J. Edwards]

>From article <5139 at pbhyf.PacBell.COM>, by kjk at PacBell.COM (Ken Keirnan):
> 
> Has anyone seen patch #2 for elm 2.2?  I've seen patches 0,1,3 and 4
> but no 2.  If I'm being premature and the patch is somewhere in the
> pipe, please disregard this posting.

Me, too!  Except I also haven't seen 0 or 1!
Thanks.

Frank "Crash" Edwards
...!uunet!pdn!jc3b21!crash