A heavy perl user speaks (was Re: Is there a good Perl book out?)
Randal Schwartz
merlyn at iwarp.intel.com
Sat Sep 2 01:23:37 AEST 1989
In article <1318 at ethz-inf.UUCP>, wyle at inf (Mitchell Wyle) writes:
| I am still using awk because the book _The_AWK_Programming_Language_ is
| so good. The examples in the book are useful and motivating.
|
| Perl is better than awk. The man page is slightly better than awk's.
| There is no book as good as A,W, and K's, however :-(
|
| Are there enough of us who would buy the book to make it worth NASA's
| while to pay Larry to write it?
|
| Is there any political support (politics a la X-windows) to get someone
| else to write it?
|
| Is there a Perl-users mailing list?
As a heavy Perl user, and alpha tester for version 3 (a few of the
features in soon-to-be-released version were at my request), I dunno
about buying the book, but I'd contribute to *writing* it. (After
all, I've spent roughly half of the past 15 years putting black dots
on white paper for various computer companies, and the other half
shuffling ones and zeroes around...)
I think Perl should replace almost *any* use of sed or awk (maybe even
grep :-), because it does things so nicely. It was also written in
the traditional UNIX philosphy... build a toolset that is powerful and
robust and predictable enough so that you can do almost any task
"cleanly".
So, whadda ya say, Larry? How about a joint effort for a book on
"everything you've wanted to compute in Perl but were afraid to ask
LWALL..."? (And, when are you going to rewrite the Configure script
for Perl in Perl? :-)
Just another satisfied customer,
--
/== Randal L. Schwartz, Stonehenge Consulting Services (503)777-0095 ====\
| on contract to Intel, Hillsboro, Oregon, USA |
| merlyn at iwarp.intel.com ...!uunet!iwarp.intel.com!merlyn |
\== Cute Quote: "Welcome to Oregon... Home of the California Raisins!" ==/
More information about the Comp.sources.bugs
mailing list