pcomm 1.1 patch 9

cbema!las cbema!las at cbnews.ATT.COM
Thu Sep 21 02:53:53 AEST 1989


In article <184 at megasys.COM> pax at megasys.COM (Garry M. Paxinos) writes:
}In article <1989Sep16.132728.7315 at trevan.uucp> trevor at trevan.uucp (Trevor J. Harris) writes:

}   Please could someone mail me this patch and any others after patch 10.

}I would appreciate it if someone could point me to a distribuition point
}for all patches to pcomm 1.1.  Thanks!

Is there some reason to be using pcomm 1.1 in preference to 1.2?  (Just
curious).  I replaced my 1.1 with 1.2, including patch sets 1 - 4, some
time ago.

BTW: Good work Emmet!

regards, Larry
-- 
Signed: Larry A. Shurr (cbema!las at att.ATT.COM or att!cbema!las)
Clever signature, Wonderful wit, Outdo the others, Be a big hit! - Burma Shave
(With apologies to the real thing.  The above represents my views only.)
(Please note my mailing address.  Mail sent directly to cbnews doesn't make it.)



More information about the Comp.sources.bugs mailing list