C News patch of 7-Sep-1990

[a.k.a. Chri]

henry at zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer) writes:
>In short, to put it bluntly, we think most of the arguments advanced
>against dated patches are spurious claptrap from people with blind bias
>against the idea, presumably because of its unfamiliarity.  The real
>advantages and disadvantages -- see list above -- don't seem to point
>strongly either way.  The balance is perhaps slightly against dating,
>but hardly strong enough to justify the vehement outpourings on the
>subject and the tendency to blame it for all C News's ills.

I haven't been following this discussion, so forgive me if this has
been mentioned before.  A really simple fix that would provide the
advantages of both schemes while getting rid of the disadvantages
would be to name the patches with a date *and* a number.  That way,
everyone is at least somewhat satisfied and noone can really complain.
For example, the patch name might look something like:

			  #35-Sep-20-1990

Then again, I don't see any real reason to change the patch names.  I
happen to *like* the date-as-name idea myself.  And, as Henry said,
the entire patch list for the current version is always included in
the patch.  Complaining about patch naming schemes seems like more
effort than it is really worth.  But then again maybe I am missing
something here.

						.oO Chris Oo.

-- 
Christopher Lishka 608-262-4485  "Dad, don't give in to mob mentality!"
Wisconsin State Lab. of Hygiene                                -- Bart Simpson
   lishka at uwslh.slh.wisc.edu     "I'm not, Son.  I'm jumping on the bandwagon."
   uunet!uwvax!uwslh!lishka                                    -- Homer Simpson