0x47e+barney not considered C

[William E. Davidsen Jr]

In article <8194 at brl-smoke.ARPA> gwyn at brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>) writes:

| NO!  X3J11 will be entitled to ignore such comments from anyone other
| than the original second-round commentor, since it has requested that
| comments in the third formal public review be limited to remarks on
| substantive CHANGES made as a result of the second public review.
| (Of course, if the third public review document is really being
| sent out without accompanying Rationale, as someone reported, it is
| possible that the cover letter containing this restriction got left
| out too.)

  Regardless of what X3J11 is entitled to do, it would be foolish to let
a mistake like this go through. "entitled to ignore" seems to be a
poorly chosen way of putting it.
-- 
	bill davidsen		(wedu at ge-crd.arpa)
  {uunet | philabs | seismo}!steinmetz!crdos1!davidsen
"Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward" -me