#pragma
Brian T. Schellenberger
bts at sas.UUCP
Tue May 31 06:14:43 AEST 1988
In article <1770 at pt.cs.cmu.edu> jgm at k.gp.cs.cmu.edu (John Myers) writes:
|In article <7960 at brl-smoke.ARPA> gwyn at brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>) writes:
|
|While it may be illegal to exec rogue when #pragma is encountered (the
|standard needs to be clarified on this point and even then will
|probably be ignored for the most part--witness the "#pragma noalias"
|suggestions.), I fail to see how the standard can prohibit an
|implementation from issuing a warning in this case.
I fail to see how running rogue can be illegal if warnings are legal. So long
as it spawns a new process to run rogue, and the code produced by the
compiler (and interpretation of the rest of the program) does not depend on
the results of the rogue game, I can't see how the standard prohibits it.
Yes, it's silly, but I still fail to see how it is prohibited.
--
--Brian, the man from
Babble-on. |Brian T. Schellenberger| ...!mcnc!rti!sas!bts |
|104 Willoughby Lane |work: (919) 467-8000 x7783|
|Cary, NC 27513 |home: (919) 469-9389 |
More information about the Comp.std.c
mailing list