static functions broken in non-Unix compilers?
Bob Larson
blarson at skat.usc.edu
Sat May 28 13:55:21 AEST 1988
In article <138 at pigs.UUCP> haugj at pigs.UUCP (John F. Haugh II) writes:
[discussing ANSI c function declarations:]
> Doug Gwyn, I believe, wrote in a follow
>up article, for those of you who missed it, that yes, you must
>declare the function to have the same storage class as the actual
>function definition itself has.
Primos (Prime) C is an exmaple of a pre-ansi compiler that does require
this. ANSI was not inovating, they were just following the strictest
existing practice.
--
Bob Larson Arpa: Blarson at Ecla.Usc.Edu blarson at skat.usc.edu
Uucp: {sdcrdcf,cit-vax}!oberon!skat!blarson
Prime mailing list: info-prime-request%fns1 at ecla.usc.edu
oberon!fns1!info-prime-request
More information about the Comp.std.c
mailing list