Reserved names in ANSI C
Henry Spencer
henry at utzoo.uucp
Mon Jul 3 07:27:00 AEST 1989
In article <3364 at buengc.BU.EDU> bph at buengc.bu.edu (Blair P. Houghton) writes:
>>Any linker that supports the bare minimum for FORTRAN. There are more
>>such linkers in the world than you'd think.
>
>Which begs the question: how difficult is it to have standard-conforming
>implementations implement a linker that handles a larger name space?
Potentially very difficult if you have to convince the supplier to
support two different object-module formats. Please, folks, let us not
get into a long debate about this one again. The facts are:
1. Some suppliers are not willing to do it immediately.
2. X3J11 is not in the business of legislating morality; its job
is to produce a standard that will be accepted and followed widely.
In the real world, this sometimes requires temporary concessions
to badly-designed but widespread existing software.
3. This particular concession *is* temporary; the draft standard
contains an explicit warning that it is likely to go away in future.
--
$10 million equals 18 PM | Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology
(Pentagon-Minutes). -Tom Neff | uunet!attcan!utzoo!henry henry at zoo.toronto.edu
More information about the Comp.std.c
mailing list