wchar_t values
Erik Naggum
enag at ifi.uio.no
Fri Apr 12 12:22:58 AEST 1991
In article <1991Apr8.011657.1780 at tkou02.enet.dec.com> diamond at jit345.swstokyo.dec.com (Norman Diamond) writes:
(Some of these people originally misinterpreted the purpose of
trigraphs, but have figured out their error. Some of their
opponents, who believe that the C language should differ from
country to country, misinterpreted the purpose of the Danish
proposal and have yet to understand their error.)
You mean, instead of [, \, ], {, |, and } looking funny in Denmark on
old terminals, all the C code in the world is going to lack the
visually appealing brackets and braces? Very clever.
Please note my country of origin: This is Norway, in Europe. I'm a
programmer, and I'm OK, no, that wasn't what I intended to say. I'm a
programmer, and I think my nation's characters in C code is about the
grossest thing that ever happened. I'm sure Keld is feeling the same
way. However, the difference in approach between Keld and yours truly
is tremendous:
Keld favors changing the world to accomodate his old terminal.
I favor changing my terminal to accomodate ISO 8859-1 (Latin 1).
(Then I'm working to get ISO Latin 1 allowed all over the place,
instead, but at least I can allow myself to think it's a step
forward.)
I maintain that the whole problem is one of (bad) display equipment.
--
[Erik Naggum] <enag at ifi.uio.no>
Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway <erik at naggum.uu.no>
More information about the Comp.std.c
mailing list