typedefing functions (Re: Is typedef char BUFFER[20] legal?)

[Erik Naggum]

In article <ENAG.91Feb4192806 at holmenkollen.ifi.uio.no>, Erik Naggum writes:

> The functions would be declared
> 
> 	f foo
> 	{ ... }

I have been informed that this is entirely bogus.

--
[Erik Naggum]					     <enag at ifi.uio.no>
Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway			   <erik at naggum.uu.no>