incomplete types for objects with linkage--prior art?
James Jones
jejones at mcrware.UUCP
Thu Feb 14 10:52:55 AEST 1991
A posting a while back indicated that the following is strictly-conforming:
struct woof arf;
struct woof {
int i, j, k;
};
It conforms because the semantics in 3.5 only refer to identifiers with no
linkage when constraining the type to be complete by the end of the declarator.
I'm curious--is there prior art for this interpretation?
James Jones
More information about the Comp.std.c
mailing list