<varargs.h> vs. function prototypes
Doug Gwyn
gwyn at smoke.brl.mil
Thu Jun 20 00:19:51 AEST 1991
In article <14423 at dog.ee.lbl.gov> torek at elf.ee.lbl.gov (Chris Torek) writes:
>In other words, we are not willing to bend over backwards (for compatibility)
>until it hurts, only until it is mildly uncomfortable. :-)
But surely it's not appreciably harder, for the few uses of varargs
functions, to type the always correct
void foo(va_alist)
va_dcl
{
char *format;
...
format = va_arg(ap, char *);
...
}
instead of the sometimes incorrect
void foo(format, va_alist)
char *format;
va_dcl
{
...
...
}
More information about the Comp.std.c
mailing list