Standards Update, IEEE 1003.4: Real-time Extensions
Henry Spencer
henry at zoo.toronto.edu
Wed Sep 26 02:44:28 AEST 1990
Submitted-by: henry at zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer)
In article <541 at usenix.ORG> brnstnd at kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein) writes:
>In the filesystem abstraction, you open a filename in one stage. You
>can't do anything between initiating the open and finding out whether or
>not it succeeds. This just doesn't match reality, and it places a huge
>restriction on programs that want to do something else while they
>communicate.
Programs that want to do two things at once should use explicit parallelism,
e.g. some sort of threads facility. In every case I've seen, this yielded
vastly superior code, with clearer structure and better error handling.
--
TCP/IP: handling tomorrow's loads today| Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology
OSI: handling yesterday's loads someday| henry at zoo.toronto.edu utzoo!henry
Volume-Number: Volume 21, Number 131
More information about the Comp.std.unix
mailing list