"comp.sys.3b2" and "comp.sources.3b2" anyone?
David Sandberg
dts at quad.sialis.com
Fri Feb 1 17:07:54 AEST 1991
In article <1991Jan31.195359.4344 at mtek.com> bbh at mtek.com (Bud Hovell @ Mtek) writes:
:In article <653 at quad.sialis.com> dts at quad.sialis.com (David Sandberg) writes:
:<Hmm. Isn't it interesting that the first sustained topic to appear in
:<comp.sys.3b1 is about every AT&T machine _but_ the 3b1?
:
:Well, the articles, you will notice, are being cross-posted. The original
:article that launched this discussion was *specifically* directed to the
:topic of whether it would make any sense to move u3b.* to comp.*.3b2.
I knew the articles were crossposted. My comment was only half-serious.
However, I felt the use of a smiley would negate the subtle point I did
want to make in the midst of the irony, so I left it out.
:Perhaps we should *not* cross-post this discussion to comp.sys.3b1, since
:those persons interested will most-probably be reading comp.sys.att anyway,
:even if they cannot get u3b.*
Now this I can agree with wholeheartedly.
--
\\ David Sandberg \ ,=, ,=, \\
// dts at quad.sialis.com / | |uadric `=,ystems //
\\ uunet!umn-cs!sialis!quad!dts \ `=\ `=' \\
More information about the Comp.sys.3b1
mailing list