more on the HFC saga
David Burris
burris at highspl
Tue May 28 13:51:53 AEST 1991
>From article <1991May23.003857.8878 at blilly.UUCP>, by bruce at balilly (Bruce Lilly):
> OK (remember, this is speculation, not hard facts): According to the
> Device Driver Development Guide, the last driver to be installed has its
> interrupt service routine(s) placed at the beginning of the interrupt
> "chain". If one is using a combo board, with few other drivers, and if the
> cmb driver is last to be installed, it might result in somewhat better
> interrupt response than if there are many loadable drivers (particularly
> huge ones like the ether driver) with the cmb driver loaded early (so that
> its interrupt routine only gets characters after the other routines have
> been polled). I'm not sure how the built-in driver for /dev/tty000 is
> linked into the interrupt service chain, but that might be another
> pertinent factor.
>
I don't understand this and I invite you to enlighten me.
If we assume a steady stream of data and understand that all the
interrupt routines must be "polled" for each interrupt, where is the
time savings?
--
================================================================
David Burris Aurora,Il.
burris at highspl ..!linac!highspl!burris
================================================================
More information about the Comp.sys.3b1
mailing list