AT&T 605 terminal with AT&T 6386 DOS-under-UNIX?
G. Michael Vrbanac
gmv at cbnews.ATT.COM
Thu Jul 14 23:21:29 AEST 1988
In article <1095 at woton.UUCP>, riddle at woton.UUCP (Prentiss Riddle) writes:
> We are in the process of evaluating an AT&T 6386 running Simultask-386
> (aka VP/ix), which lets us run DOS under Unix. This requires the use
> of a supplement to termcap/terminfo which maps between DOS i/o and what
> a terminal understands.
>
> We're pulling our hair out trying to find terminals and configuration
> files which will let us run DOS satisfactorily from a serial line.
> (The complications caused by incompatible character sets, screen sizes
> and key combinations get to be pretty ugly.) One of the few terminals
> which Simultask-386 claims to support is the AT&T 605. Unfortunately
> its config file (/usr/vpix/term/605) contains the following caveat:
>
text deleted
>
> Does anyone know any more about this? Is there any chance that the ROM
> bug has been or will be fixed? How much of a problem does this cause in
> practice? (We don't yet have our hands on a 605 terminal.)
>
I have a 6386, UNIX, VPIX (a.k.a. Simul-Task) and a 605 terminal. The
setup screen for the 605 has four choices for "Terminal Mode" which are:
norm, XT, AT1 and AT2. Norm is regular old ascii and the other three are
flavors of IBM PC keyboards. I have never been able to make it talk to
UNIX (nor VPIX either, for that matter) in any of the PC keyboard scan-code
modes. The only thing that talks is "norm" mode which obviates the advantages
of the 605. I have not been able to locate any documentation, guidelines
or directives on how to make it work.
Mike Vrbanac
{att!}cblpf!gmv
More information about the Comp.sys.att
mailing list