oh geez, is it .att.3b1 or .3b1
Bruce D. Becker
bdb at becker.UUCP
Thu Dec 6 11:00:47 AEST 1990
In article <76015 at iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> templon at copper.ucs.indiana.edu (jeffrey templon) writes:
|Well, the last poster tied it up - my summary (see previous post) says 4
|specifically want comp.sys.3b1 and four specifically comp.sys.att.3b1
|(with 6 more who did not care.)
|
|How about a mini-vote, just on the NAME, with the two choices being
|
|comp.sys.3b1
|
| and
|
|comp.sys.att.3b1
|
|I don't think any other name has a chance in hell, so I'll ignore them.
|The source group name seems unanimous, comp.sources.3b1.
You forgot "unix-pc.general" and
"unix-pc.sources".
I think in your rush you don't recall
that there are a lot of us who have a
bad feeling about all of this...
--
,u, Bruce Becker Toronto, Ontario
a /i/ Internet: bdb at becker.UUCP, bruce at gpu.utcs.toronto.edu
`\o\-e UUCP: ...!uunet!mnetor!becker!bdb
_< /_ "Making the world safe for demography" - Western Culture (tm) Yoghurt
More information about the Comp.sys.att
mailing list