oh geez, is it .att.3b1 or .3b1
David Neill-OKCy Mktg 405-278-4007
dwn at swbatl.sbc.com
Wed Dec 5 00:39:43 AEST 1990
In article <76015 at iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> templon at copper.ucs.indiana.edu (jeffrey templon) writes:
>
>Well, the last poster tied it up - my summary (see previous post) says 4
>specifically want comp.sys.3b1 and four specifically comp.sys.att.3b1
>(with 6 more who did not care.)
>
>How about a mini-vote, just on the NAME, with the two choices being
>
>comp.sys.3b1
>
> and
>
>comp.sys.att.3b1
>
ok, I mini-vote for
comp.sys.3b1
and
comp.sources.3b1
I would have no problem with the "s4" designation mentioned
earlier, ie:
comp.sys.s4
and
comp.sources.s4
I mini-vote no for any *.att.* combination, but if that's the
consensus, I'll real-vote to support it.
--
name & address (this account) -> uunet!swbatl!dwn OR dwn at swbatl.sbc.com
David Neill office -> 405-291-1990 -> uunet!swbatl!oktext!mktco
Mgr - Mktg.(SWBTCo) home -> 405-843-4464 -> uunet!swbatl!oktext!frodo!david
More information about the Comp.sys.att
mailing list