c++ vs ada results

Paul Martz pmartz at undies.dsd.es.com
Thu Jun 13 05:15:09 AEST 1991


In article <1991Jun12.164741.412 at news.larc.nasa.gov>, alan at hal.larc.nasa.gov (alan dare) writes:
> 
> 
> Netlanders,
> 
> 	A short time ago I put a request out for information on c++ vs
> Ada. [...] The comments
> below were sent to me. I don't claim any responsibility for them. I don't
> currently use c++ or Ada. The comments are provided as a request from many 
> people. Please don't use this posting to start a language war. 
> 
> [...]
> 
> o	I use C++ for graphics work. We considered ADA.
> 	Both have great pluses and a lot of minuses.
> 	Mostly the minuses are finding existing graphics packages 
> 	which are compatible. They are rare with C++ and non-existent 
> 	with ADA to my knowledge.

Just for the record, Evans & Sutherland sells an Ada binding to PHIGS
for use with our ESV graphics workstation.

> [...]
> 
> *********************************************************************
> Alan Dare                     |  Internet : alan at hal.larc.nasa.gov
> NASA Langley Research Center  | 
-- 

   -paul	pmartz at dsd.es.com
		Evans & Sutherland



More information about the Comp.sys.sgi mailing list