c++ vs ada results
Paul Martz
pmartz at undies.dsd.es.com
Thu Jun 13 05:15:09 AEST 1991
In article <1991Jun12.164741.412 at news.larc.nasa.gov>, alan at hal.larc.nasa.gov (alan dare) writes:
>
>
> Netlanders,
>
> A short time ago I put a request out for information on c++ vs
> Ada. [...] The comments
> below were sent to me. I don't claim any responsibility for them. I don't
> currently use c++ or Ada. The comments are provided as a request from many
> people. Please don't use this posting to start a language war.
>
> [...]
>
> o I use C++ for graphics work. We considered ADA.
> Both have great pluses and a lot of minuses.
> Mostly the minuses are finding existing graphics packages
> which are compatible. They are rare with C++ and non-existent
> with ADA to my knowledge.
Just for the record, Evans & Sutherland sells an Ada binding to PHIGS
for use with our ESV graphics workstation.
> [...]
>
> *********************************************************************
> Alan Dare | Internet : alan at hal.larc.nasa.gov
> NASA Langley Research Center |
--
-paul pmartz at dsd.es.com
Evans & Sutherland
More information about the Comp.sys.sgi
mailing list