SMD Vs SCSI: Results of Survey

Anthony A. Datri hsi!stpstn!aad at uunet.uu.net
Fri Dec 23 07:39:34 AEST 1988

Previous message (by thread): Multiple dumps to /dev/nrst8 fail
Next message (by thread): SMD Vs SCSI: Results of Survey
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

maxlin!wbc at dartvax.dartmouth.edu writes:
>We have a3/160 with 3 3/50(60) clients, OS 3.4.  long ago we decided to go
>to SMD despite the extra expense for the following reason: The scsi bus
>seems to be able to talk to one device at a time.

As I remember, Sun didn't implement disconnect/reconnect on the scsi bus,
but I thought this was fixed in 3.4.

Previous message (by thread): Multiple dumps to /dev/nrst8 fail
Next message (by thread): SMD Vs SCSI: Results of Survey
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Comp.sys.sun mailing list