SVVS requires a panic? Was: Re: CRASH your TANDEM :
Chuck Karish
karish at mindcraft.com
Mon Mar 18 05:47:26 AEST 1991
In article <6685 at auspex.auspex.com> guy at auspex.auspex.com (Guy Harris) writes:
>AT&T has
>done some bogus things in the SVVS [ ... ] , but
>requiring that the system *panic* wasn't one of them, at least not in
>the version of the SVVS I've seen.
It sounded sort of odd to me at the time. Perhaps I misunderstood.
The actual capabilities of Tandem's systems also sounded wildly
improbable to one who's used to less-robust implementations.
Chuck Karish karish at mindcraft.com
Mindcraft, Inc. (415) 323-9000
More information about the Comp.unix.admin
mailing list