setuid (was Re: Non Destructive Version of rm)
j chapman flack
chap at art-sy.detroit.mi.us
Mon May 13 22:57:51 AEST 1991
In article <JIK.91May6001507 at pit-manager.mit.edu>,
jik at athena.mit.edu (Jonathan I. Kamens) writes:
>
> both because setuid programs are a
> bad idea in general,
Could someone elaborate?
--
Chap Flack Their tanks will rust. Our songs will last.
chap at art-sy.detroit.mi.us -MIKHS 0EODWPAKHS
Nothing I say represents Appropriate Roles for Technology unless I say it does.
More information about the Comp.unix.admin
mailing list