Sluggish behavior of IBM 6000/320
Dewey Paciaffi
eddjp at edi386.UUCP
Wed Dec 19 04:06:37 AEST 1990
In article <1990Dec17.224518.5188 at ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> bowman at uiatma.atmos.uiuc.edu writes:
>
> -[ describes a Model 320 with sluggish performance ]-
>
>My only information about the problem I have is that ps shows a kernel process
>using about 98% of the cpu time. (process 514 below)
> USER PID PPID C STIME TTY TIME COMMAND
> root 0 0 120 13:25:45 ? 0:05 swapper
> root 1 0 0 13:26:02 ? 0:46 /etc/init
> root 514 0 120 Dec 31 ? 181:32 kproc
> root 771 0 0 13:25:45 ? 0:07 kproc
>
>Ken Bowman
I have a pair of 320's and I am getting the same results on the
ps. This machine's been up for about 5573 minutes:
11:30am up 3 days, 20:53, 6 users, Runable processes: 4
The kproc , also PID 514, also started on Dec 31 appears to be
quite CPU intensive:
USER PID PPID C STIME TTY TIME COMMAND
root 514 0 76 Dec 31 - 5455:51 kproc
However, 'ps av' reveals that the kproc process is not using any
cpu or memory:
USER PID TTY PGIN SIZE RSS TSIZ TRS %CPU %MEM CMD
root 514 - 0 12 4 0 4194300 0.0% 0% kproc
I'm not real sure of what this indicates...
In my examination of the ps output I did notice this:
USER PID TTY PGIN SIZE RSS TSIZ TRS %CPU %MEM CMD
root 0 - 6 4668 7600 0 3800 0.1% 47% swapper
Wow ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I only have 16M in these machine. Is the swapper really taking up half
of my real memory?
--
Dewey Paciaffi ...!uunet!edi386!eddjp
More information about the Comp.unix.aix
mailing list