IBM support (sic) story
Robin Wilson
robin at pensoft.uucp
Fri Apr 19 03:49:28 AEST 1991
In article <1991Apr17.195425.8885 at rodan.acs.syr.edu> grboyce at rodan.acs.syr.edu (George Robert Boyce) writes:
>In trying to add a 3rd party scsi disk to my RS6000/530 server (BTW,
>why does IBM support make us call it a 7013?), I ran into two small
>problems.
{stuff deleted}
>So on Monday my SE arrives, we start from scratch and after two or
>three commands we run into the problem, he records the error message
>and agrees we should call software support. Level one support wasn't
>of much help but they did suggest that we reboot the system and see if
>that helped. It *seemed* like a reasonable suggestion so that is what
You mean "Level 2" support. LEVEL 1 SUPPORT IS ONLY THE "800" NUMBER!!!
THE LEVEL 1 PERSON MERELY TRANSFERS YOU TO LEVEL 2. LEVEL 1 CAN (AT BEST)
ONLY GIVE YOU STATUS (BY READING THE PROBLEM RECORD TO YOU - THEY CAN'T
EVEN ATTEMPT TO INTERPRET IT FOR YOU). Whenever you open a new problem,
you will provide the problem description to LEVEL 2.
>hardware support insisting that there was no hardware problem, we get
>the call transfered to level two software support. Once connected, we
>got the magic commands needed to fix the problem. A third problem came
>up; I was using an old set of maintenance disks and the instructions
>didn't work. The level two support person was able to recognize my
>error, and correct it and the whole procedure took 15 minutes.
>
>15 minutes is a damn good time for any support call and I was very
>happy. But I am still wondering how to cut down on the *six hours* it
>takes to get to the right support person.
Sigh. This is probably the fault of the original Level 2 person who took
your call. (BTW, If; in fact, Level 1 advised you to do anything to your
machine, there is a serious problem with the support system... Since level
1 people don't know anything about the machines -- they support ALL IBM
SYSTEMS, it would be impossible for them to know anything about most of
them.)
In this particular case, I would say that you got the exception rather than
the rule. Try to remember that level 2 is training new people "ALL THE
TIME". While that doesn't excuse the fact that this person sent you on
a wild goose chase, it might explain it. If the level 2 person seems to be
telling you something that doesn't make sense, and they cannot logically
explain to you why it should make sense, then ask them to speak to a manager.
The manager will make sure that the "best" technical person for your problem
type will assist you.
>On 4/9/91, Pierre Asselin wrote
>
>> General conclusions from earlier exercises:
>>
>> o Software Defect Support is officially limited to its narrow mandate.
>> o Technical support is available for the RISC-6000's.
>> It's called comp.unix.aix.
Its is actually available through the SE, and IBMLINK. And it is getting
better every day. (But if nobody calls them, they won't get any better -
you have to exercise the horse if you want to win the race.)
>> o Accurate information on the RISC-6000's is available, but only
>> on comp.unix.aix.
Clearly, this is not true. The above case illustrates that. Getting to
the right people may take a little effort, but it is there.
>> o Accurate information on the IBM support structure is available,
>> but only on comp.unix.aix.
This is also not completely true. If you ask the Level 2 manager to explain
it to you, they will provide as complete a description as (IBM policies allow
for) possible.
>> o To this day, IBM is convinced that it's doing a fine job.
>> o Hardware support does work. Beats me.
>
>I have to argue that level two software support knows their stuff. The
>problem then is that IBM has a level one support system in place (a)
>to protect the valuable and expensive resources of level two by (b)
>answering the easy questions. I would argue that level one one does
>half of their job. They do a hack of a job of protecting the level two
>folks.
Since you really only got Level 2 support for all of your assistance, your
comments are a double edged sword. Level 2 failed to provide the right
answer the first time, but did provide the right answer the second time.
Try to remember that Level 1 knows nothing about any of the IBM systems,
and are not intended to answer any questions (at least for AIX support) -
they are merely data-entry operators for the level 2 people in Austin.
>So that leaves us with comp.unix.aix for level one support, and a good
>but well protected level two support. It could be worse. I think there
>are also other possible solutions to this situation. We could try to
>convince IBM that (a) they have a support problem and (b) that it is a
>serious problem. That seems like it could be a lot of work and we
>haven't even solved the problem yet, just made IBM recognize it.
Seems that IBM is working to solve this perception. Training takes time.
The machine is not even 1 yr old yet (officially). The people at level 2
who know the most, have also been there the longest (by-and-large).
>My own oppinion is that IBM should subcontract level one support to
>local and regional support service companies and provide all the
>necessary support to make it work. But then I've just formed such a
>company so my oppinion is biased. Regardless, I am calling my local
>office right now to suggest it...
Dream on ;-). They do "sub-contract" some of the level 2 and level 3 work,
but level 1 is only the phone answering service, so that will never change.
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|The views expressed herein, are the sole responsibility of the typist at hand|
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|UUCP: pensoft!robin |
|USNail: 701 Canyon Bend Dr. |
| Pflugerville, TX 78660 |
| Home: (512)251-6889 Work: (512)343-1111 |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
More information about the Comp.unix.aix
mailing list