Why no comp.sys.ibm.r6000?

[Hemant Shah]

In article <1991Apr17.035222.18286 at midway.uchicago.edu> rtp1 at quads.uchicago.edu (raymond thomas pierrehumbert) writes:
>
>I notice that this group (now that I've finally found it!) basically
>serves the function of "comp.sys.r6000".  So why is it stuck under
>unix?  We have comp.sys.hp, not comp.unix.HPUX, and comp.sys.apollo,
>not comp.unix.DOMAIN.  What's the history here?  
>    Is anybody interested in establishing comp.sys.ibm.r6000 and
>moving there?  


Yes I am interested. I think it is necessary.




                                            #####  #####
Hemant Shah                                 #####  #####           
Fermilab                               ######################      
ACCESS/System Integration              ######################      
                                            #####  #####           
                                          #######  #######         
Email address :                  ################  ################
                                 ##############      ##############
>From VMS :                       ############          ############
SMTP%"shah at cdsun5.fnal.gov"
                                 ############          ############
>From UNIX :                      ##############      ##############
shah at cdsun5.fnal.gov             ################  ################
                                          #######  #######        
Voice : (708) 840-8071	                    #####  ##### 
                                       ######################      
                                       ######################
                                            #####  #####
                                            #####  #####