Lies, damned lies, and benchmarks: RS6000 v. SS-1+
Udo Klimaschewski
udo at watzman.quest.sub.org
Fri Feb 1 15:22:00 AEST 1991
>From article <1991Jan30.003004.74 at intek01.uucp>, by mark at intek01.uucp (Mark McWiggins):
> Any comments on this from RS6000 users? Thanks in advance.
Yupp. I agree.
This damned 530 here is a real good number-cruncher.
Ray tracing is fun - but never NEVER let anybody else use this beast
while you are using e.g. vi. You have to wait 20 secs for a response.
As long as theres no IO, its's quite ok, though.
Apart from the bugs :-)
I have this one in 'w' since some weeks, dunno why:
udo at trash<31>w
5:17am %d day%s, 4:537126188, 6 hr|.&8, Runable processes: 4
Usertty login@ idle JCPU PCPU what what
root hft/0 Di7pm 6:12 45 1 -ksh
michaelv pts/2 2:22pm 7:33 18 1 -csh
udo pts/3 Mo2pm 30 0 0 -
udo pts/0 3:51am 0 0 0 -
As you can see, it's 5am - and I fought against that rubbish X-server
the whole night - sigh.
Buy a sparc ...
regards
udo
--
XmTeenageMutantNinjaMessageBoxGetChild(Widget,XmDIALOG_DEFAULT_BUTTON);
More information about the Comp.unix.aix
mailing list