Ethernet problems with 3.1
Robin D. Wilson
robin at batman
Fri Jun 21 03:30:22 AEST 1991
In article <4136 at beguine.UUCP> Shawn.Hayes at bbs.oit.unc.edu (Shawn Hayes)
writes:
> When I logged onto the sick computer everything seemed fine, except for
> network communications. When I tried to ping another computer I got an
> error message of 'send: no route to host' which ususally implies that
> the host that I'm trying to connect to isn't in the hosts file. However
> after
> looking at all of the configurations in SMIT everything is as it was and
> thes sick RS/6000 was able to communicate earlier. So I then tried to ping
> the sick computer from the sick computer without any luck. I got the message
> that there was no route to host.
Actually, "no route to host" implies that the network interface (en0) was not
active. I suggest that you verify 2 things: 1) en0 is configured; and 2) inetd
is running (if this ever happens again).
--
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|The views expressed herein, are the sole responsibility of the typist at hand|
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|UUCP: pensoft!robin |
|USNail: 701 Canyon Bend Dr. |
| Pflugerville, TX 78660 |
| Home: (512)251-6889 Work: (512)343-1111 |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
More information about the Comp.unix.aix
mailing list