Telebit Trailblazer + and A/UX
Paul Traina
pst at comdesign.CDI.COM
Fri Jan 6 12:44:35 AEST 1989
>From article <150 at radar.UUCP>, by root at radar.UUCP (root):
> Has anyone used a Telebit Trailblazer Plus modem with a Mac II under
> A/UX? I'm curious about what arrangements were used for flow control,
> how it worked communicating with the Mac at 19.2K, and what kind of
> throughput with uucp communicating with another TB+ was obtained.
I just set one up yesterday. No flow control (actually, one *could*
use hardware flow control, since standard modem cables for the mac
have input-handshake going to pin 5 (cts) on a DB25, but then you
have no way of detecting carrier). uucico seems to be configurable
to only 9600 baud. I made a cursory stab at trying to get it to run
19.2k, but had no immediate success, so I just dropped in in at 9600.
Mac II <-> Sun 3/280 --- about 890 characters/sec (limited because of 9600
baud on the Mac...sigh).
For reference, IBM AT clone, Microport UNIX, 19.2k <-> Sun 3/280
runs on average about 14kbps, with occasional increases to 18k when
sending text (as opposed to compressed news batches).
All in all the TB+ is wonderful, the Mac leaves something to be desired.
I'm upset with apple that they do not provide more handshake lines.
Hardware flow control is the optimal way to deal with a modem, but
the mac only has one output signal (going to DTR) and one input
signal (going to CTS for a standard cable, DCD if you wish carrier
detect).
--
work: pst at condor.cdi.com {apple,pyramid,ucsbcsl,uunet}!comdesign!pst
play: pst at ai.ai.mit.edu {ucsbcsl,comdesign,dscvax2}!nessus!pst
school: pst at cornu.ucsb.edu pst at sbitp.bitnet
"I'm not a scientist, but I play one on TV."
More information about the Comp.unix.aux
mailing list