NFS mounting from Macs
Dave Wells
dwells at Apple.COM
Tue May 23 16:28:35 AEST 1989
In article <415 at wizard.UUCP> john at wizard.UUCP (John Danner) writes:
>Can someone explain to me why a Mac using the same hard drive as a Sun386i
>might be significantly slower as an NFS server? There seems to be a
>significantly longer amount of time needed to transfer large files or to
>save a large file under emacs, etc. I have heard something like A/UX's
...
The method used to prepare the disk for A/UX use is very important to
the performance of any drive. I take it you've already tried and experienced
poor performance? The most common pitfall in preparing HDs for A/UX use
has to be the mkfs command. What options did you specify?
Be _very_ careful with the gap parameter It defaults to 7 and can kill
disk performance.
-Dave
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Dave Wells, Apple Computer, Inc. MS: 37-O (408) 974-5515
Mail: dwells at apple.com or AppleLink d.wells or GEnie D.WELLS
These opinions may be nothing more than the ramblings of a fatigued tinkerer
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
There's one big difference between genius and stupidity. Genius has limits.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
More information about the Comp.unix.aux
mailing list