Databases under UNIX-386
Steve Dyer
dyer at spdcc.COM
Wed Sep 6 11:59:09 AEST 1989
Progress is rather nice in some ways, but the fact that it's a procedural
language without subroutines was ultimately VERY frustrating. You could
construct macro-substitution templates which expand in-line into code,
which gives you a subroutinish feel, but all the versions of the language
I used (up to and including 4.0--I don't know what's current now) had a
strict 64K limit on compiled-byte-code size, which liberal use of macro
expansions would break. Also, the lack of local variables was another pain.
--
Steve Dyer
dyer at ursa-major.spdcc.com aka {ima,harvard,rayssd,linus,m2c}!spdcc!dyer
dyer at arktouros.mit.edu, dyer at hstbme.mit.edu
More information about the Comp.unix.i386
mailing list