1 more rn problem with interactive

[John C. Rossmann]

In article <171 at brandy.UUCP> mark at brandy.UUCP (mark hilliard) writes:
>
>in common.h :
>
>char	*sprintf();
>
>causes the following error:
>
>
>"./common.h", line 674: redeclaration of sprintf
>
>
>the man says that sprintf should be a int, and NOT a pointer
>
>Mark Hilliard


What patchlevel is your version of rn?  Mine is level 40. My common.h
(after Configure) does not have the sprintf() declaration at all. When I
compile, there are no pointer type mismatch warnings, so I assume that
the code is not assigning sprintf()'s return value to any pointers (and
the code works fine).

Maybe Configure is finding different things on your system than mine?
I didn't think BT/Intel/ATT V/3.2 would be THAT different from 386/ix.
(When I last ran Configure, I think it was against my 3.0 system, but
the sprintf() function declaration didn't change.)

Can someone else shed more light on this?

John Rossmann		(uunet!synsys!john)