ESDI controller recommendations
Dr. Scump
aland at infmx.UUCP
Fri Sep 8 15:32:19 AEST 1989
In article <1989Sep4.024559.13279 at ddsw1.MCS.COM> karl at ddsw1.MCS.COM (Karl Denninger) writes:
>...
>The people here, who read and post to this group, are working with and
>talking about ISA 80386 machines. That means AT bus. Like it or not,
Says who?
>are lots of compelling reasons for using the AT bus, and companies such as
>DPT make it more than reasonable to do so. Items like multiple-sourcing,
>inexpensive price points, interchangability of operating environments (pick
>your Unix), etc.
Since when is the charter of this group limited to ISA?
Are you telling us that MCA-based (Micro Channel) machines don't belong
here? Remember, ISC is shipping their current 2.0.2 release for MCA
bus also. Do you want MCA people kicked out into a separate newsgroup?
>Such a machine IS a real computer. It has 3-5X the power of a Vax 780,
yeah, but who says the VAX 780 is a "real computer"? :-] :-] :-]
>Karl Denninger (karl at ddsw1.MCS.COM, <well-connected>!ddsw1!karl)
--
Alan S. Denney @ Informix Software, Inc.
{pyramid|uunet}!infmx!aland "I want to live!
-------------------------------------------- as an honest man,
Disclaimer: These opinions are mine alone. to get all I deserve
If I am caught or killed, the secretary and to give all I can."
will disavow any knowledge of my actions. - S. Vega
More information about the Comp.unix.i386
mailing list