NFS vs. PC Interface w/ SCO ODT...
Paul Gillingwater
paul at actrix.co.nz
Thu Aug 16 10:58:46 AEST 1990
In article <26576 at usc.edu> rpinder at phad.hsc.usc.edu (Rich Pinder) writes:
>I am considering purchasing the SCO Open Desktop with Server upgrade. Can
>anyone help me understand the differences between the NFS Server, and the
>PC-Interface. Both seem to have similar features, and I don't know which
>will be best for my goal: I have 10 dos pc's, sitting on the campus wide
>ethernet backbone. I want them to be able to access data sitting on the
>server running SCO ODT. Which of these scenarios would yield faster
>performance over the net, and which would require less ram usage on the pc?
There is another option....
Microsoft LAN Manager. Just install LM/X on SCO UNIX, and LAN Manager
on your PC's. They talk over TCP/IP. Note that LM/X uses a TCP/IP
version that is slightly different from the ODT standard, so this
requires some config. changes.
As for performance and RAM -- not sure.
--
Paul Gillingwater, paul at actrix.co.nz
More information about the Comp.unix.i386
mailing list