Simple X windows benchmark
Rick Richardson
rick at pcrat.uucp
Mon Jul 30 12:03:30 AEST 1990
In article <1990Jul28.014025.17578 at pegasus.com> richard at pegasus.com (Richard Foulk) writes:
>One data point:
>
> Unix: ISC 2.0.2 Unix
> X server: ISC X11R3 1.0.0, Xhrc
> Resolution: 720x348x2
> Video card: Hercules monochrome graphics clone
> Cpu: 33MHz 386 (Mylex), 128k cache, 8megs RAM
> 80387: no
>
> Time: 1:43
Here's another point, for the slowest 386 we've got:
Unix: ISC 2.0.2 Unix
X server: ISC X11R3 1.0.0, Xvga
Resolution: 640x480x16
Video card: Paradise EGA-480
Cpu: 16MHz 386 (Mylex), 64k cache, 4MB 32 bit + 4MB 16 bit
80387: no
80287: yes
Time: 1:39
This is rather strange. The elapsed times are so close,
even though there is at least a factor of two difference
in the raw performance of the machines.
I'd guess one or both of the following are true:
1) The herc server has had zero tuning
2) The test saturates the bandwidth to the herc card
-Rick
--
Rick Richardson | Looking for FAX software for UNIX/386 ??? Ask About: |Mention
PC Research,Inc.| FaxiX - UNIX Facsimile System (tm) |FAX# for
uunet!pcrat!rick| FaxJet - HP LJ PCL to FAX (Send WP,Word,Pagemaker...)|Sample
(201) 389-8963 | JetRoff - troff postprocessor for HP LaserJet and FAX|Output
More information about the Comp.unix.i386
mailing list