Interactive 2.2 problems
Tim Brown
tim at comcon.UUCP
Tue Jul 3 20:11:41 AEST 1990
In article <382 at denwa.uucp>, jimmy at denwa.info.com (Jim Gottlieb) writes:
>
> I have been working with 2.2 for a few days now, and I'm starting to
> wonder if we should have bothered upgrading. Some of the problems
> listed below have been mentioned by others. I repeat them for
> completeness.
[ HPDD stuff ]
> * I told mailmgmt that we have both TCP/IP and UUCP connections and
> that I want to use smail, but only if an address ends in .UUCP does
> it send it to smail. Otherwise, it fails with a name look-up error.
> Did someone at Interactive think that all UUCP addresses end in
> .UUCP? I'm not a sendmail guru so I don't know how to fix this.
>
> * When local mail is sent, 'rmail -i username' is invoked. The mail
> is properly delivered but the process never dies, so ps shows tons
> of 'rmail's lying around.
My problem is similiar but it is sendmail that won't die.
>
> * Slowness. The system seems to be noticably slower than 2.0.2 and
> this bothers me. Commands that used to pop something onto the
> screen immediately now pause for a second or two before doing
> anything. Also noticably slower is video output. We have a
> hercules adapter and whereas before when I was using 'more' or 'pg'
> the next page would almost just appear in a very fast smooth scroll,
> the screen now jerks as it scrolls a line at a time. I was hoping
> this was just my imagination, but I now have our 2.2 machine right
> next to a 2.0.2 machine, and I now know I'm not going crazy.
>
Your not crazy! I see it too. The only thing that seems "better" is
that TCP seems to work now.
It *really* pi---- me off when I called to ask about these things and
learned of the "support" policy. I am seriously looking at ESIX like
never before!
Tim Brown
{}!nstar!comcon!tim
More information about the Comp.unix.i386
mailing list