Unix/386 lint -- how good?
Bill England
wengland at stephsf.UUCP
Thu Jun 14 08:09:31 AEST 1990
In article <2662C59D.3C5A at tct.uucp> chip at tct.uucp (Chip Salzenberg) writes:
>So, my question: How good is the lint provided with modern versions of
>Unix/386? Specifically, can it deal with prototypes? Please send
>E-Mail or post a followup article, as you feel appropriate.
>--
>Chip Salzenberg at ComDev/TCT <chip%tct at ateng.com>, <uunet!ateng!tct!chip>
Sadly the lint on SCO Unix does not reconize prototypes. However, if
you are going to spend the money on a 'decent lint' you could go for
a full blown ansi standard c compiler like Metawear's. Tom Pennello
and Frank Deremer have been _very_ responsive to porting their compiler
to other Unix Systems in the past ( Convergent for Example ) and
I'm sure they would love to sell some to the new Unix PC Environment's.
There is a MetaWare Inc. in the mail maps with an address off of
uunet or ucscc. Try adam at metaware.uucp.
I have used the compiler ( Convergent Systems )and it has excellent
type checking, prototyping ansii compatable modes, generates great
code, use's lots of 386 instructions, - drop em a line, it beats a
simple lint program! -
I'll bet that if SCO used the MW compiler that their system preformance
would improve. ( Goes also for Interactive and Esix. )
+--------
| Bill England
| Stephen Software Systems, Inc., Tacoma Wa.
| wengland at stephsf.com +1 206 564 2122
|
* * H -> He +24Mev
* * * ... Oooo, we're having so much fun making itty bitty suns *
* *
More information about the Comp.unix.i386
mailing list