2nd call to vote comp.unix.sco, undecided?

[Conor P. Cahill]

In article <1990May1.161300.8249 at oct1.UUCP> mason at oct1.UUCP (David M. Mason) writes:
>In article <836 at sixhub.UUCP> davidsen at sixhub.UUCP (Wm E. Davidsen Jr)
>writes:
>>In article <1990Apr26.130747.6047 at virtech.uucp> cpcahil at virtech.UUCP
>(Conor P. Cahill) writes:
>> 
>>| Several quotes about the "need" for comp.unix.sco were quoted in
>>| this article.  It appears to me that most of them were from SCO.
>
>Cahill's incoming mail looks somewhat like the result of some sort of
>internal office memo at SCO saying "get out there and post `Viva
>comp.unix.sco' ".

You are reading things wrong.  I pointed out that the propoganda in 
the second call to votes appeared to be mostly, if not all, from SCO.

You should be sure to get your attributions right before posting.

Besides, don't most people like to be called by thier first name?

>This is strictly my opinion.

Ditto.

-- 
Conor P. Cahill            (703)430-9247        Virtual Technologies, Inc.,
uunet!virtech!cpcahil                           46030 Manekin Plaza, Suite 160
                                                Sterling, VA 22170