How do you find the symbolic links to files.
Elizabeth Zwicky
zwicky at erg.sri.com
Tue Dec 11 06:15:22 AEST 1990
In article <2469:Dec1001:13:4390 at kramden.acf.nyu.edu> brnstnd at kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein) writes:
>Elizabeth said that ``you have to get pretty intimate with the disk'' to
>tell that a file has holes, or something like that. She concluded that
>an archiver can with good conscience restore files with as many holes as
>possible, hence saving as much space as possible.
No, actually, Elizabeth didn't say either of those things. And doesn't
believe the latter at all and requested counter examples.
What I did say is that you cannot tell the difference between a hole
and an equivalent number of nulls without reading raw blocks.
st_blocks at best tells you how many holes there are; it doesn't tell
you *where*. Just as programs may, conceivably, care what st_blocks is
(care to name one that does?), they may also care where the holes are
(I have no examples of this one either, but it's equally imaginable).
I conclude from this that good archivers are not portable. One can
arguably conclude that if you want a portable program, you can in good
conscience restore files with as many holes as possible, since you
can't get it right.
Elizabeth Zwicky
More information about the Comp.unix.internals
mailing list